Well the local Buell shop finally got one in.
It's very very tiny. The XB9R fells like a small bike, but with the smaller tail section and no front fairing, the S fells like a Schwin. I'll have to go back later for a test run (I was on my lunch), but I can say that I'm sure it'll be a blast to ride.
To read the 385lb. dry weight spec and then sit on the bike, you'd swear they'd over estimated the bike by at least 50 lbs. The closest thing I can compare it to is maybe a big RS or TZ 250 as far as weight and size feel go.
The ergos are fairly up right but tighter in the foot peg to seat relationship department than my 919 is. I can't really see it as a bike that the owners will do too many high mile days on, but then again I've seen guys tour on 916's across the US, so I guess anythings possible.
All in all, I can see it as being a very desirable 2nd bike for somebody who has a bigger tour type bike
or
the only bike for somebody who does weekend burns through the twisties and short commutes during the week.
It's very very tiny. The XB9R fells like a small bike, but with the smaller tail section and no front fairing, the S fells like a Schwin. I'll have to go back later for a test run (I was on my lunch), but I can say that I'm sure it'll be a blast to ride.
To read the 385lb. dry weight spec and then sit on the bike, you'd swear they'd over estimated the bike by at least 50 lbs. The closest thing I can compare it to is maybe a big RS or TZ 250 as far as weight and size feel go.
The ergos are fairly up right but tighter in the foot peg to seat relationship department than my 919 is. I can't really see it as a bike that the owners will do too many high mile days on, but then again I've seen guys tour on 916's across the US, so I guess anythings possible.
All in all, I can see it as being a very desirable 2nd bike for somebody who has a bigger tour type bike
or
the only bike for somebody who does weekend burns through the twisties and short commutes during the week.
