:hiexcessa said:
I realize this doesn't answer your question and that I'm not truly poor poor... but I'm kind of a dreamer...
One of these days I'll realize that dream though.
and money never really mattered much to me.
:hiexcessa said:
20% misc. the dreamers, the hippies and idealists.
As far as climbing the economic ladder, there's not room on it for all of us anyhow, so, I guess some have to fall off...
I'd say it's probably over 75%, on the generous side.excessa said:
Are the "economically disadvantaged" in general lazier than others?
65% are choosing not to pursue higher education and better jobs, due to feelings of hopelessness, laziness, stupid-ness, etc. They are stuck in a rut, and seeing no immediate way out, they resign themselves to the rut. They are eithernot smart enough to get up that ladder, lazy, drinkers, druggers, or some other sort of shifty.
As far as climbing the economic ladder, there's not room on it for all of us anyhow, so, I guess some have to fall off...
Well, the poor around here are basically generation poor. Growing up in generations of poverty deliberately imposed on them by the employers of past generations. Many times, they have to work before finishing school, so lots of people don't even have a GED.excessa said:....Are the "economically disadvantaged" in general lazier than others?
Did they choose to be poor, or choose not to work hard enough to make good money? Do you think most are just not as bright? We can't really do one big swoop of judgment, so I'll give you what I think the percentage breakdown is of the truly poor, and you tell me what you think, and why.
Those who favor a "more equitable distribution of wealth" feel free to explain why. I'll quickly tell you why I am against it in a while....
I believe this country provides you with all the opportunities one needs to succeed. You just have to seek out the opportunities and work for it. I see too many young people just living for the next weekend and not giving any thought about where they want to be in the next 5-10 years.lawdog said:
....I said what I said is because it seems that some people that lean to the left attach some sort of nobility to being poor. They seem to think that everyone who is poor is a victim of circumstances that are beyond their control. IMO very few poor people are poor because of forces beyond their control.
In my personal experience I find that a great deal of people who I meet that are poor are so because they turned their back on opportunities life offered them. Things like a free education, trade schools, or job training. Many never prepared for the future. They live to party. A lot dropped out of school and most made bad life choices.
Bad choices like dropping out of school, having children at too young of an age, having too many children, getting involved in crime and becoming addicted to alcohol or drugs....
Well, since my new job deals with "welfare" of a sort, I can tell you this....lawdog said:....Now I am not attempting to equate the above tale as an example of all of who are poor and on welfare. I just think that something needs to be changed with how we give out aid. I think there is something to the saying that, "An idle mind is the Devil's playground"....
+1 I agree...many times a person is a product of their environment.Baby Gorilla said:
Some are lazy, but not because they want to be lazy....they've just been brought up to see it as acceptable behavior.
True 'dat. Can you believe i used to get by on $0.25/week when i was in grade school :eek Now i'm making, like, twice that!Enthalpy said:
Most people do not remain in one earnings bracket their entire lives.
[/URL]
That is dumb that it would reflect badly on your agency.Baby Gorilla said:
Problem is, if we kick them out, it's a "negative exit" which makes our performance look bad and impacts if we keep getting money to help people. :rolleyes A dumb factor since the rules say we can't turn away the people we believe are not going to finish the program in the first place. :rolleyes